AlwaysMoney Crypto Exchange Comparison Methodology: Honest, Consistent, Useful
The market of crypto exchangers and exchanges has grown to hundreds of platforms — from centralized giants like Binance and Kraken to non-custodial instant swap services. Picking the “best” one isn’t simple: every platform has its strengths and weaknesses. That’s exactly why a balanced comparison of crypto exchanges using a single methodology is critical for users.
At AlwaysMoney, we follow a simple and transparent approach to reviews. Our goal is to cut through marketing noise and deliver practical conclusions based on facts, not slogans. In this piece, we show in detail how we compare exchangers, how we evaluate fees, and how we build step-by-step, in-depth reviews of crypto exchanges.
Contents
- Why a methodology matters
- What exactly we compare
- 8 key comparison criteria
- Methodology summary table
- How we collect data
- How our approach is different
- Examples of materials
- Practical tips for choosing an exchange
- FAQ
- Takeaways
Why a methodology matters
Comparing prices and fees is only part of the picture. Your end result is equally influenced by fees, exchange speed, asset and fiat support, security, interface convenience, and support quality. Without a single evaluation standard, reviews turn into a set of subjective opinions.
Our methodology ensures that when you read a comparison like “Changelly vs AlwaysMoney,” “SimpleSwap vs AlwaysMoney,” “Uniswap vs AlwaysMoney,” “FixedFloat vs AlwaysMoney”, you get comparable and reproducible conclusions. Instead of generalities, we answer a trader’s concrete questions:
- Which platform delivers the fastest instant swap?
- How do fees change across different volumes?
- Which platforms enjoy the highest community trust?
- How secure is the exchanger’s infrastructure?
- What B2B tools and APIs are available for businesses and power users?
What exactly we compare
We evaluate centralized exchanges (CEX), decentralized protocols (DEX), and non-custodial instant swap exchangers. The goal is to help the reader understand which type of solution best fits their scenario: fast “crypto-to-crypto” swaps, fiat on-ramp purchases, active trading, or B2B integrations.
8 key comparison criteria
1. Fees and pricing transparency
Why it matters: fees directly affect the outcome of a deal, and spread plus execution specifics can change the final price.
What we check: spot/margin/futures trading fees (if available), instant swap fees (fixed vs floating rate), clarity of how all charges are shown — no “fine print.” The goal is to make a crypto exchange fee comparison precise and actionable.
2. Asset and fiat support
Why it matters: more options mean more flexibility for the user.
What we check: number of supported coins and trading pairs, availability of fiat on/off-ramp, payment methods (bank cards, transfers, Apple Pay, etc.). We separately note network popularity for transfers (for example, TRC-20 as a widely used network).
3. Exchange speed and reliability
Why it matters: in a volatile market, time is money. Delays lead to missed opportunities.
What we check: average swap and fiat operation times, behavior under load (e.g., during Ethereum congestion), systеm stability. This gives a realistic sense of where to find the fastest exchange for your task.
4. Security and trust
Why it matters: protecting funds is a non-negotiable priority.
What we check: custody model (custodial/non-custodial), AML/KYC compliance, audits and transparency, incident history and response.
5. User experience (UX)
Why it matters: a convenient interface saves time for beginners and speeds up pros.
What we check: intuitiveness for new and advanced users, quality of mobile apps and localization, extra features (address book, permanent wallets, loyalty programs).
6. Customer support
Why it matters: even the best services need strong support — it saves hours and nerves.
What we check: channels (chat, e-mail, tickets, Telegram/Discord), response speed and usefulness, share of “human” support vs bots.
7. Reputation and user feedback
Why it matters: user opinions often reveal what numbers don’t show.
What we check: verified reviews on Trustpilot, discussions on Reddit and niche forums, recurring complaints/praise, perceived honesty and transparency.
8. Ecosystem and B2B tools
Why it matters: businesses and developers care about APIs, widgets, white-label, and partnerships.
What we check: API functionality (trading, payments), widgets for sites and wallets, white-label solutions, integrations with wallets and exchanges, referral/affiliate programs.
Methodology summary table
| Criterion | What we evaluate | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Fees and pricing | Trading/swap fees, spreads, transparency | Affects final price and trade outcome |
| Assets and fiat | Number of coins/pairs, on/off-ramp, payment methods | Flexibility for purchase and exchange scenarios |
| Speed and stability | Average times, behavior under load | Timely execution and trust |
| Security | Custody model, AML/KYC, audits, incidents | Protection of funds and data |
| UX | Ease of use, mobile apps, extra features | User speed and accuracy |
| Support | Channels, response speed and quality | Problem-solving without delays |
| Reputation | Reviews, forums, recurring patterns | Real community impressions |
| B2B and ecosystem | APIs, widgets, integrations, partnerships | Readiness for business use cases |
How we collect data
We use a mix of primary and secondary sources: official exchange websites and documentation, our own tests of swaps and usage scenarios, verified reviews (for example, Trustpilot), blockchain analytics (confirmation times, network fees), industry reports, and new-feature announcements.
How our approach is different
Many comparisons stop at fees or coin counts. We combine rate and fee comparison with analysis of UX, security, and ecosystem. Our framework applies equally to instant exchangers, CEX, and DEX. Every review references this methodology so readers understand why the conclusions look the way they do.
Practical tips: how to choose your exchange
When reading comparisons, answer a few questions:
- Do you prioritize speed or minimal fees?
- Do you need fiat support and local payment methods?
- Are integrations and APIs important for your business cases?
- How do you factor in reputation and verified reviews?
[prompt=’widget’]
For market dynamics at a glance, use the live chart:
BTC/USDT real-time chart
Quick market snapshots for coins:
BTC and USDT market data
Bitcoin Price
$89.53K24H % Change
-0.06%Market Cap
$1.79T24H Volume
$23.14BCirculating Supply
19.96MTether Price
$1.0024H % Change
0.01%Market Cap
$185.68B24H Volume
$40.22BCirculating Supply
185.63BPlus a basic rate converter:
BTC → USDT exchange rate
BTC to USDT
| BTC | USDT |
|---|---|
| 0.001 BTC | 89.544150 USDT |
| 0.005 BTC | 447.720750 USDT |
| 0.01 BTC | 895.441500 USDT |
| 0.05 BTC | 4,477.207500 USDT |
| 0.1 BTC | 8,954.415000 USDT |
| 0.5 BTC | 44,772.075000 USDT |
| 1 BTC | 89,544.150000 USDT |
| 5 BTC | 447,720.750000 USDT |
| 10 BTC | 895,441.500000 USDT |
| 25 BTC | 2,238,603.750000 USDT |
| 50 BTC | 4,477,207.500000 USDT |
| 100 BTC | 8,954,415.000000 USDT |
| 150 BTC | 13,431,622.500000 USDT |
| 500 BTC | 44,772,075.000000 USDT |
| 1000 BTC | 89,544,150.000000 USDT |
| 3000 BTC | 268,632,450.000000 USDT |
USDT to BTC
| USDT | BTC |
|---|---|
| 0.001 USDT | 0.00000001 BTC |
| 0.005 USDT | 0.00000006 BTC |
| 0.01 USDT | 0.00000011 BTC |
| 0.05 USDT | 0.00000056 BTC |
| 0.1 USDT | 0.00000112 BTC |
| 0.5 USDT | 0.00000558 BTC |
| 1 USDT | 0.00001117 BTC |
| 5 USDT | 0.00005584 BTC |
| 10 USDT | 0.00011168 BTC |
| 25 USDT | 0.00027919 BTC |
| 50 USDT | 0.00055838 BTC |
| 100 USDT | 0.00111677 BTC |
| 150 USDT | 0.00167515 BTC |
| 500 USDT | 0.00558384 BTC |
| 1000 USDT | 0.01116768 BTC |
| 3000 USDT | 0.03350303 BTC |
And finally — why swap the asset right now at all:
FAQ
Takeaways
Choosing a crypto exchange isn’t about “the most popular platform,” it’s about a systematic check of fees, speed, selection, security, UX, and reputation. Our methodology delivers objective and applicable comparisons that help you make independent decisions in the dynamic year 2025.